La Teaching and Training of The St Century University Teacher in Paraguay

Authors

  • Orlando Saucedo Argüello Universidad Nacional Villarrica del Espíritu Santo, Facultad de Psicología, Villarrica – Paraguay
  • Osbaldo Andrea Saucedo Piccinini Universidad del Norte, Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas, Villarrica – Paraguay.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47185/27113760.v1n2.29

Keywords:

Curriculum, Training, Education, Paraguay, Teaching

Abstract

In current times, Paraguay faces two very clear situations, the teaching and training of university teachers. Teaching in university education is under the gaze of regulatory entities such as the Ministry of Education and Sciences (MEC), the National Council of Higher Education (CONES), the National Agency for the Evaluation and Accreditation of Higher Education, (ANEAES) and the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT). The presentation on educational quality in Paraguay is exposed through bodies created by law, which regulate the opening of Universities and the educational functions within them, also creating the Research Center (CONACYT), each estate with its own work team. It focuses on the organizational part, guidelines and organizing quality criteria for the apparently optimal performance of universities and therefore that of teachers, a very complex and complicated task, because the authors are subject to a number of structural obstacles, organizational, including politics. A critical look at teacher training is a reality, which does not go in parallel with what is intended to be achieved, which is an educational quality. It is necessary to look at an interaction curriculum such as mirror education and the internalization of university education and teaching in our country, urgently and necessary. Another work mechanism that can lead to Paraguay is to work on skills and abilities with teaching based on challenges, challenges and future projections. Curricular reengineering is necessary to improve the quality and training of future professionals for the exercise of each of the professions developed through Universities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Science education. Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153

Alberts, B. (2010). Prioritizing science education. Science, 328(5977), 405. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190788

Bradforth, S. E., Miller, E. R., Dichtel, W. R., Leibovich, A. K., Feig, A. L., Martin, J. D., Bjorkman, K. S., Schultz, Z. D., & Smith, T. L. (2015). University Learning: Improve Undergraduate Science Education. Nature, 523(7560), 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/523282a

Bridges, D. R., Davidson, R. A., Odegard, P. S., Maki, I. V., & Tomkowiak, J. (2011). Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Medical Education Online, 16, 10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035

De Los Santos, M., McFarlin, C. D., & Martín, L. (2014). Interprofessional education and service learning: a model for the future of health professions education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(4), 374–375. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2014. 889102

Guarnizo-Herreño, C. C., Watt, R. G., Garzón-Orjuela, N., Suárez-Zúñiga, E., & Tsakos, G. (2019). Health insurance and education: major contributors to oral health inequalities in Colombia. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 73(8), 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-212049

Hines, P. J., Wible, B., & McCartney, M. (2010). Science, language, and literacy. Learning to read, reading to learn. Introduction. Science,

(5977), 447. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.328.5977.447

Kessler P. S. (2010). Science education: learn by listening. Science, 329(5993), 749. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5993.749-a

Krajcik, J. S., & Sutherland, L. M. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328(5977), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182593

Phillips, D. A., & Lowenstein, A. E. (2011). Early care, education, and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130707

Silverstein S. C. (2006). How teaching matters. CBE Life Sciences Education, 5(4), 316–317. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-09-0186

Waldrop M. M. (2015). Why we are teaching science wrong, and how to make it right. Nature, 523(7560), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1038/523272a

Weeb, P. (2010). Science education and literacy: imperatives for the developed and developing world. Science, 328(5977), 448–450.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182596

Wilches-Luna, E. C., Hernández, N. L., Hernández, O. M., & Pérez-Vélez, C. M. (2016). Conocimientos, actitudes, prácticas y educación sobre tuberculosis en estudiantes de una facultad de salud [Knowledge, atitudes, practices and education among students in a faculty of health]. Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia), 18(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v18n1.42424

Winkler B. S. (2015). Undergraduate teaching: Education reforms ring true 50 years on. Nature, 525(7569), 321. https://doi.org/10.1038/525321f

Published

2021-02-05

How to Cite

Saucedo Argüello, O., & Saucedo Piccinini, O. A. (2021). La Teaching and Training of The St Century University Teacher in Paraguay. Revista Innovación Digital Y Desarrollo Sostenible - IDS, 1(2), 56 - 60. https://doi.org/10.47185/27113760.v1n2.29

Issue

Section

Artículos originales